Home/Insights/Madrid vs direct filing
Strategy

Madrid designation or direct CNIPA filing? The trade-off nobody explains

Both routes end at the same register. What differs is who controls the goods list, what happens if your home mark falls, and whether anyone is on record to answer a Chinese office action before the deadline.

Published 2026-10-288 min readBy Shengbang IP

If you already file internationally, the Madrid route looks like the obvious answer: one form, one currency, one renewal date, China included. Most of the time it is a reasonable choice. But the two routes are not equivalent, and the differences show up at the worst possible moment — when an examiner in Beijing has issued a refusal and the clock is running.

How Madrid actually works into China

China has been a Madrid Protocol member since 1989. You file an international application through your home office, based on a home application or registration, and designate China. WIPO forwards the designation to CNIPA, which examines it as if it were a national application and either grants protection or issues a provisional refusal.

Three mechanics matter more than the brochure suggests:

  • The goods list is fixed at filing. A Madrid designation can only be narrowed later, never broadened. Whatever you wrote at home — often in your own national wording — is what China examines.
  • CNIPA usually has 18 months to examine, and can notify a longer period. In practice a Madrid designation into China takes longer than a direct filing, not shorter.
  • A refusal is addressed to you, via WIPO, with a short response deadline. If no Chinese agency is on record, nobody is positioned to answer it, and the designation quietly lapses.
The failure mode we see most A brand designates China in a Madrid application, hears nothing for a year, assumes it is fine, and discovers later that a provisional refusal was issued — and the response deadline passed. The mark was never protected. Nothing about Madrid warns you loudly; the notification goes to whoever filed the international application, which is often a foreign attorney who does not monitor China.

How a direct filing works

A direct application is lodged with CNIPA by a Chinese-registered agency, in Chinese, with a goods list drafted against the Chinese classification. One application covers one class. You can claim a six-month Paris priority from an earlier filing elsewhere.

It is administratively more work: a power of attorney, a translated incorporation document, a separate filing and fee per class, and separate renewals. In exchange you get control.

Side by side

Madrid designationDirect CNIPA filing
Official costLower, especially across multiple classesRMB 270 per class, plus RMB 27 per item over ten
Goods listInherited from the home filing; can only be narrowedDrafted for China from scratch
Examination timeUp to 18 months, often longer in practiceTypically 3–4 months end to end
DependencyFive-year central attack riskIndependent from day one
Refusal handlingNeeds a Chinese agent appointed in advance; deadline is shortAgent already on record and monitoring
CertificateStatement of protection via WIPOCNIPA registration certificate
RenewalOne renewal for the whole international registrationSeparate per registration, ten-year cycles
Assignment and recordalThrough WIPO, then notified to ChinaDirectly at CNIPA
Best forBroad multi-country portfolios, simple word marks, goods list already China-compatibleChina as a priority market, complex goods lists, brands needing certainty

When Madrid is the right call

  • China is one of eight or ten designations in a single commercial push, and administrative simplicity outweighs timing;
  • Your goods list is straightforward and already uses internationally accepted wording;
  • You have a Madrid representative who will appoint a Chinese agent now, not after a refusal arrives;
  • The mark is a plain word mark with no Chinese-character element to coordinate.

When a direct filing wins

  • China is the market, not a line item. You want the earliest possible certainty.
  • You sell in unusual categories — software-as-a-service, mixed retail, food supplements — where the Chinese classification needs careful drafting.
  • You are also filing the Chinese-character mark, which a Madrid designation cannot easily carry alongside the English one.
  • You need the certificate for a platform brand registry, a customs recordal or a licensing deal.
  • Your home mark is not yet stable — a pending application that could still be refused is a poor foundation for a five-year dependent right.

The hybrid most sophisticated brands use

They are not mutually exclusive. A common pattern:

  1. Direct filing in China for the core classes and the Chinese-character mark, treated as the primary asset;
  2. Madrid designations for the surrounding markets where administrative convenience matters more than a few months;
  3. Paris priority used to pull the Chinese filing date back to the home filing date when the two are within six months.

The result is one date to protect, one agent who knows the file, and no dependency on a home mark you may later restructure.

If a provisional refusal arrives

This is where the two routes diverge most sharply in cost, and it is worth understanding before you choose.

A provisional refusal is not a rejection. It is CNIPA saying "we have an objection, respond". The usual grounds are an earlier similar mark, a lack of distinctiveness, or goods wording that does not fit the Chinese classification. You can respond with arguments, with a limitation of the goods list, with a coexistence agreement, or with a parallel cancellation against the blocking mark.

The deadline is counted in days, not months, from receipt. Two consequences:

  • Under Madrid, the notice travels through WIPO and your home representative. Every hop costs days. By the time it reaches someone who can act, the window may be half gone.
  • Under a direct filing, the agent who filed is the agent who is notified, and the response is drafted in Chinese by the same team that drafted the application.

Before you choose, answer four questions

  1. Is China a market or an afterthought? A market gets a direct filing.
  2. Does your goods list read like the Chinese classification? If not, a direct filing saves you an office action.
  3. Are you registering a Chinese-character mark too? That pushes toward direct filing.
  4. Who will open the mail from WIPO? If the answer is "our foreign attorney, eventually", appoint a Chinese agent now.

If you are unsure, the cheapest diagnostic is a search. Send us the mark and the classes; we will tell you whether the goods list you plan to designate is likely to be accepted in China, and whether the route you have chosen is going to cost you a refusal.

Not sure where your brand stands in China?

Send us your mark and the classes you care about. We run a free CNIPA availability check and come back within 48 hours with a risk rating, the closest citations, and a fixed fee.